Simplified Chinese (GB2312) in Manila

Messages: 29.

Shown in hierarchical outline order.
Forward chronological order | Reverse chronological order

Simplified Chinese (GB2312) in Manila
2/21/2002 by Emmanuel. M. Decarie

I'm too exited to keep this to myself. It has to be tested further, with other browsers and on other platforms, and with people

RE: Simplified Chinese (GB2312) in Manila
2/21/2002 by Nobumi Iyanaga

Hello Emmanuel, I looked at your Chinese page. It seems very good. I think the Simplified Chinese is rather easy to handle, because

RE: Simplified Chinese (GB2312) in Manila
2/21/2002 by Jonathan Lewis

Dear Nobumi and Emmanuel, As you can see from http://133.14.174.35/transTest3/ it is possible to render Japanese and other languages

RE: Simplified Chinese (GB2312) in Manila
2/21/2002 by Emmanuel. M. Decarie

Jonathan, that's very interesting. Thanks for the input. >Read on the web at http://community.scriptmeridian.org/16122 >----------------------------------

RE: Simplified Chinese (GB2312) in Manila
2/22/2002 by Nobumi Iyanaga

Hello Jonathan, >Read on the web at http://community.scriptmeridian.org/16122 >---------------------------------- >

RE: Simplified Chinese (GB2312) in Manila
2/22/2002 by Samuel Reynolds

>How do you render UTF-8 text in Frontier...? As Frontier is not Unicode >savvy, I think all text in UTF-8 is garbled in

RE: Simplified Chinese (GB2312) in Manila
2/22/2002 by Brian Andresen

On 2/22/2002 9:45 AM, Samuel Reynolds <sam@spinwardstars.com> wrote: >UTF-8 is the 8-bit subset of unicode that corresponds

RE: Simplified Chinese (GB2312) in Manila
2/23/2002 by Nobumi Iyanaga

Hello Samuel and Brian, >Read on the web at http://community.scriptmeridian.org/16162 >----------------------------------

RE: Simplified Chinese (GB2312) in Manila
2/23/2002 by Samuel Reynolds

>Read on the web at http://community.scriptmeridian.org/16162 >---------------------------------- > >On 2/22/2002

RE: Simplified Chinese (GB2312) in Manila
2/24/2002 by Jonathan Lewis

Dear Nobumi, Sorry for the long delay in replying. Thanks for the tip about browsers. I'll take a look at Omniweb and, gulp,

RE: Simplified Chinese (GB2312) in Manila
2/21/2002 by Emmanuel. M. Decarie

Hi Nobumi, I'm happy to hear from you again. >I looked at your Chinese page. It seems very good. I think the >Simplified

RE: Simplified Chinese (GB2312) in Manila
2/22/2002 by Nobumi Iyanaga

Hello Emmanuel, > >Now the client want me to check if he could use the search engine. > >In theory, it should work

RE: Simplified Chinese (GB2312) in Manila
2/22/2002 by Emmanuel. M. Decarie

>Read on the web at http://community.scriptmeridian.org/16141 >---------------------------------- > >Hello Emmanuel,

RE: Simplified Chinese (GB2312) in Manila
2/22/2002 by Emmanuel. M. Decarie

Anyone know this book: http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/cjkvinfo/ It look like what I need but its a little bit ancient (published

RE: Simplified Chinese (GB2312) in Manila
2/23/2002 by Nobumi Iyanaga

Hello Emmanuel, >Read on the web at http://community.scriptmeridian.org/16153 >---------------------------------- >

RE: Simplified Chinese (GB2312) in Manila
2/23/2002 by Emmanuel. M. Decarie

>Read on the web at http://community.scriptmeridian.org/16165 >---------------------------------- > >Hello Emmanuel,

RE: Simplified Chinese (GB2312) in Manila
2/22/2002 by Nobumi Iyanaga

Hello Emmanuel, > >Well I found this page which is quite helpful: ><http://www.ascc.net/xml/en/utf-8/faq/zhl10n-faq-xsl2.html>

RE: Simplified Chinese (GB2312) in Manila
2/23/2002 by Emmanuel. M. Decarie

Hello Nobumi, À (At) 22:24 -0500 22/02/02, Nobumi Iyanaga écrivait (wrote) : >Read on the web at http://community.scriptmeridian.org/16164

RE: Simplified Chinese (GB2312) in Manila
2/23/2002 by Nobumi Iyanaga

Hello Emmanuel, > >Also, I had the wrong assumption that 2 chars == 1 word in Simplified >Chinese when one word in Simplified

RE: Simplified Chinese (GB2312) in Manila
2/23/2002 by Emmanuel. M. Decarie

>Read on the web at http://community.scriptmeridian.org/16172 >---------------------------------- > >Hello Emmanuel,

RE: Simplified Chinese (GB2312) in Manila
2/24/2002 by Nobumi Iyanaga

Hello Emmanuel, > > > >I think this is a good idea. But I imagine it would not be very simple to > >type Chinese

RE: Simplified Chinese (GB2312) in Manila
2/24/2002 by Emmanuel. M. Decarie

Hello Nobumi, >Read on the web at http://community.scriptmeridian.org/16185 >---------------------------------- (...) >

Re: Simplified Chinese (GB2312) in Manila
2/26/2002 by Henri Asseily

Sorry to chime in so late, and slightly off topic, but I have a couple of pieces of code that might be of interest: First, I

RE: Simplified Chinese (GB2312) in Manila
2/26/2002 by Emmanuel. M. Decarie

Hello Henri, This sound very interesting. Could you put the Perl and C codes on a web page so other interested could download

RE: Simplified Chinese (GB2312) in Manila
2/23/2002 by Emmanuel. M. Decarie

Thinking more about this, and rereading this page: <http://www.ascc.net/xml/en/utf-8/faq/zhl10n-faq-xsl2.html>, I think

RE: Simplified Chinese (GB2312) in Manila
2/23/2002 by Emmanuel. M. Decarie

Thinking more about this, and rereading this page: <http://www.ascc.net/xml/en/utf-8/faq/zhl10n-faq-xsl2.html>, I think

RE: Simplified Chinese (GB2312) in Manila
2/23/2002 by jt

I'm just catching up, and haven't followed all the links. But it seems like you have a winnah, Emmanuel...! It would require

RE: Simplified Chinese (GB2312) in Manila
2/28/2002 by Phil Suh

On Thu, 21 Feb 2002, Nobumi Iyanaga wrote: > And Phil, are you still interested in rendering Japanese text with > Frontier?

RE: Simplified Chinese (GB2312) in Manila
3/1/2002 by Emmanuel. M. Decarie

À (At) 17:33 -0500 28/02/02, Phil Suh écrivait (wrote) : >WITH REGARD TO SPACING IN CHINESE > >Emmanuel, the strategy