RE: Conversant 1.0b2
Posted
Last Modified
In Response To
5/28/2002; 8:31 AM by Seth DillinghamLast Modified
In Response To
5/28/2002; 8:31 AM by Seth Dillingham
Re: Conversant 1.0b2 (#16849)
Reply To This Message [Edit]
On 5/28/02, David Davies said:
>>IMO, 2 weeks to evaluate such a complex product is quite short.
>
>I'm with Emmanuel on this. I've pretty much ground to a halt now without any documentation, specifically for the bits I'm
>interested in like plugins. This new evaluation copy will likely expire around the time the docs are available, or not long after.
>I think I'll wait before looking at Conversant again, but rest assured I will take another look when the docs come out.
David,
Did you try looking over some of the existing plugins? The "Bookmarks" plugin, for example, is a good place to start.
As I said on the Conversant site, if you can give us some idea of what you want to do, it'll help us with writing the docs. We're going to release them piecemeal...
Seth
>>IMO, 2 weeks to evaluate such a complex product is quite short.
>
>I'm with Emmanuel on this. I've pretty much ground to a halt now without any documentation, specifically for the bits I'm
>interested in like plugins. This new evaluation copy will likely expire around the time the docs are available, or not long after.
>I think I'll wait before looking at Conversant again, but rest assured I will take another look when the docs come out.
David,
Did you try looking over some of the existing plugins? The "Bookmarks" plugin, for example, is a good place to start.
As I said on the Conversant site, if you can give us some idea of what you want to do, it'll help us with writing the docs. We're going to release them piecemeal...
Seth
Enclosures
None.
Replies
None.