RE: Conversant 1.0b2
Posted
Last Modified
In Response To
5/28/2002; 9:28 AM by Seth DillinghamLast Modified
In Response To
5/28/2002; 9:28 AM by Seth Dillingham
Re: Conversant 1.0b2 (#16848)
Reply To This Message [Edit]
On 5/28/02, Emmanuel. M. Decarie said:
>IMO, 2 weeks to evaluate such a complex product is quite short. In
>fact, the developer license could be use for evaluation. But at $99
>dollars, its a little bit expensive just to test the product. I'll
>pay $40 bucks in a breeze to help support the product and check it at
>my pace, but I'll have to think twice at $99.
I didn't say you were going to have to pay for it on June 8, I said that the current pre-release version is going to expire then.
The 1.0 release will have a licensing tool built into it that will allow its own time-limited free evaluation period (probably 30 days). If/when you decide to purchase a license, you'll just install the license file we send to you and pick up where you left off.
Seth
>IMO, 2 weeks to evaluate such a complex product is quite short. In
>fact, the developer license could be use for evaluation. But at $99
>dollars, its a little bit expensive just to test the product. I'll
>pay $40 bucks in a breeze to help support the product and check it at
>my pace, but I'll have to think twice at $99.
I didn't say you were going to have to pay for it on June 8, I said that the current pre-release version is going to expire then.
The 1.0 release will have a licensing tool built into it that will allow its own time-limited free evaluation period (probably 30 days). If/when you decide to purchase a license, you'll just install the license file we send to you and pick up where you left off.
Seth
Enclosures
None.
Replies
RE: Conversant 1.0b2
5/28/2002 by Emmanuel. M. Decarie
>Read on the web at http://community.scriptmeridian.org/16850 >---------------------------------- > >On 5/28/02,
5/28/2002 by Emmanuel. M. Decarie