[OT] OSX vs NetBSD on G4 400 (AGP)
Posted
Last Modified
In Response To
5/27/2002; 10:38 AM by Emmanuel. M. DecarieLast Modified
In Response To
5/27/2002; 10:38 AM by Emmanuel. M. Decarie
(#Top of Thread.)
Reply To This Message [Edit]
Hello,
I'd like to use a server that doesn't need Aqua (the server will use
Perl, Apache and MySQL).
I know FreeBSD and I'd like to stay in the BSD universe. I was
wondering if a G4 400 (AGP) will run better in this context with
NetBSD 1.5.2. I heard somewhere that if Aqua is not used, it doesn't
add an overload on the server. So my question is, should I stick with
OS X or install NetBSD (my impression is that the server will be much
more faster with NetBSD). To be clear, I really don't need a
graphical interface (KDE/Gnome/WindowMaker... or Aqua).
Cheers
-Emmanuel
--
______________________________________________________________________
Emmanuel Décarie / Programmation pour le Web - Programming for the Web
Frontier - Perl - Javascript - XML <http://scriptdigital.com/>
I'd like to use a server that doesn't need Aqua (the server will use
Perl, Apache and MySQL).
I know FreeBSD and I'd like to stay in the BSD universe. I was
wondering if a G4 400 (AGP) will run better in this context with
NetBSD 1.5.2. I heard somewhere that if Aqua is not used, it doesn't
add an overload on the server. So my question is, should I stick with
OS X or install NetBSD (my impression is that the server will be much
more faster with NetBSD). To be clear, I really don't need a
graphical interface (KDE/Gnome/WindowMaker... or Aqua).
Cheers
-Emmanuel
--
______________________________________________________________________
Emmanuel Décarie / Programmation pour le Web - Programming for the Web
Frontier - Perl - Javascript - XML <http://scriptdigital.com/>
Enclosures
None.
Replies
None.