RE: Manila Message Level Access Control - test and review period
Posted
Last Modified
In Response To
3/1/2002; 7:03 AM by David BaylyLast Modified
In Response To
3/1/2002; 7:03 AM by David Bayly
Re: Manila Message Level Access Control - test and review period (#16226)
Reply To This Message [Edit]
On Thu, 28 Feb 2002 14:40:32 -0500, jim@roepcke.com (Jim Roepcke) wrote:-
>
> Read on the web at http://community.scriptmeridian.org/16226
> ----------------------------------
>
> On Thursday, February 28, 2002, at 05:05 AM, Jim Byrne wrote:
>
> > David,
> >
> > For what it is worth - I also think term cohorts is a bit confusing. I
> > had
> > to stop and think what exactly it was about when reading the
> > instructions.
>
> While it might not be the most obvious term, I think David has the right
> idea in picking something slightly off-mainstream. History has shown
> that UserLand doesn't always consider the 3rd party namespace before
> deciding what to call new features in their namespace.
>
A very diplomatic statement, thank you Jim:-).
Actually the name was suggested by the person who got me interested
in the problem;.
I'm amenable to changing it before I release it into the world, but
nobody has suggested a better term as yet, just grumbled about the
word.
Hardly anyone has responded to the call for feedback either, so I
assume that it is of little interest outside a small group. I will
probably release it this weekend.
--
- David Bayly. Programmer and digest reader. dbayly at udena dot ch
Digest Readers do it once a day.
>
> Read on the web at http://community.scriptmeridian.org/16226
> ----------------------------------
>
> On Thursday, February 28, 2002, at 05:05 AM, Jim Byrne wrote:
>
> > David,
> >
> > For what it is worth - I also think term cohorts is a bit confusing. I
> > had
> > to stop and think what exactly it was about when reading the
> > instructions.
>
> While it might not be the most obvious term, I think David has the right
> idea in picking something slightly off-mainstream. History has shown
> that UserLand doesn't always consider the 3rd party namespace before
> deciding what to call new features in their namespace.
>
A very diplomatic statement, thank you Jim:-).
Actually the name was suggested by the person who got me interested
in the problem;.
I'm amenable to changing it before I release it into the world, but
nobody has suggested a better term as yet, just grumbled about the
word.
Hardly anyone has responded to the call for feedback either, so I
assume that it is of little interest outside a small group. I will
probably release it this weekend.
--
- David Bayly. Programmer and digest reader. dbayly at udena dot ch
Digest Readers do it once a day.
Enclosures
None.
Replies
[ANN] manilaFixer plugin 1.9 released
3/1/2002 by David A. Bayly
A new version of the manilafixer plug-in is now available through root updates. It will appear in the <a href='http://www.udena.ch/baylys/gems/Bayly.root.sit'>downloadable</a>
3/1/2002 by David A. Bayly