Re: A Little Feedback on the SM Design Revision
Posted
Last Modified
In Response To
2/26/2002; 1:24 PM by James SpahrLast Modified
In Response To
2/26/2002; 1:24 PM by James Spahr
RE: A Little Feedback on the SM Design Revision (#16200)
Reply To This Message [Edit]
> My problem is that most of the site is illegible.
>
> I'm using IE6 (Windows) with text size set to smaller. 99% of sites are
> completely fine this way, but those that use fractional ems for font sizes
> quickly get very small.
I will fix this David, and the other issues that have been brought up. But
for the next couple days my paying job is going to get a bit more attention
than the SM site. I know you all understand. :)
Yes, the community site looks like it has been re-designed, but I still
consider it very much a rough comp. Conversant is beautiful to work with,
but there is still a mighty learning curve -- things are not going as fast
as I expected.
James.
>
> I'm using IE6 (Windows) with text size set to smaller. 99% of sites are
> completely fine this way, but those that use fractional ems for font sizes
> quickly get very small.
I will fix this David, and the other issues that have been brought up. But
for the next couple days my paying job is going to get a bit more attention
than the SM site. I know you all understand. :)
Yes, the community site looks like it has been re-designed, but I still
consider it very much a rough comp. Conversant is beautiful to work with,
but there is still a mighty learning curve -- things are not going as fast
as I expected.
James.
Enclosures
None.
Replies
RE: Compress that learning curve
2/26/2002 by Seth Dillingham
On 2/26/02, James Spahr said: >Yes, the community site looks like it has been re-designed, but I >still consider it very
2/26/2002 by Seth Dillingham
RE: A Little Feedback on the SM Design Revision
2/26/2002 by David Carter-Tod
At 12:24 PM 2/26/2002 -0500, James Spahr wrote: >I will fix this David, and the other issues that have been brought up. But
2/26/2002 by David Carter-Tod