Josh,

"No harm, no foul"... Or maybe a double-foul should have been called...;-)

Several of us were discussing using SourceForge today. It's useful to
discuss SourceForge and CVS. The quickest approach to getting *anything*
done is to use existing infrastructure and tools...

But I think Brent hit the nail on the head. His point, as I take it, was
that once you select a particular technology, you've pretty much limited
your goals to what can be accomplished efficiently with that technology.
But there's a lot to be gained by taking the long route of defining what
really WANTS to be done, and then finding and/or building the tools to
accomplish those goals. That's what I gather from Brent's post, anyway.

It depends more on who all wants to participate in these contrasting
approaches, rather than which is the "best" approach, AFAIK.

jt

| -----Original Message-----
| From: sm.community@lists.scriptmeridian.org
| [mailto:sm.community@lists.scriptmeridian.org]On Behalf Of josh lucas
| Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 6:43 PM
| To: sm.community@lists.scriptmeridian.org
| Subject: RE: [SM] To the heart of the matter [Msg#16161]
|
|
| Read on the web at http://community.scriptmeridian.org/16161
| ----------------------------------
|
| that's fine. I was just responding to some things which struck me..
| Nothing more..
|
|
| josh
|

Enclosures

None.  

Replies

None.