RE: Simplified Chinese (GB2312) in Manila
Posted
Last Modified
In Response To
2/22/2002; 7:13 PM by Brian AndresenLast Modified
In Response To
2/22/2002; 7:13 PM by Brian Andresen
RE: Simplified Chinese (GB2312) in Manila (#16145)
Reply To This Message [Edit]
On 2/22/2002 9:45 AM, Samuel Reynolds <sam@spinwardstars.com> wrote:
>UTF-8 is the 8-bit subset of unicode that corresponds to
>the ISO-8859 (Latin-1) "extended ASCII" character set that
>is the Windows default set. Character 0xnn in UTF-8 is
>always character 0x00nn in unicode.
UTF-8 only preserves the ASCII character set. You may be thinking of
ISO-8859-1, in that Unicode chars U+0000 to U+00FF are exactly the
characters in ISO-8859-1. Win1252 is very similar to ISO-8859-1 but not
identical.
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2279.txt
http://www.microsoft.com/globaldev/reference/sbcs/1252.htm
http://www.unicode.org/Public/MAPPINGS/ISO8859/8859-1.TXT
http://www.unicode.org/Public/MAPPINGS/VENDORS/MICSFT/WINDOWS/CP1252.TXT
-Brian
>UTF-8 is the 8-bit subset of unicode that corresponds to
>the ISO-8859 (Latin-1) "extended ASCII" character set that
>is the Windows default set. Character 0xnn in UTF-8 is
>always character 0x00nn in unicode.
UTF-8 only preserves the ASCII character set. You may be thinking of
ISO-8859-1, in that Unicode chars U+0000 to U+00FF are exactly the
characters in ISO-8859-1. Win1252 is very similar to ISO-8859-1 but not
identical.
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2279.txt
http://www.microsoft.com/globaldev/reference/sbcs/1252.htm
http://www.unicode.org/Public/MAPPINGS/ISO8859/8859-1.TXT
http://www.unicode.org/Public/MAPPINGS/VENDORS/MICSFT/WINDOWS/CP1252.TXT
-Brian
Enclosures
None.
Replies
RE: Simplified Chinese (GB2312) in Manila
2/22/2002 by Nobumi Iyanaga
Hello Samuel and Brian, >Read on the web at http://community.scriptmeridian.org/16162 >----------------------------------
2/22/2002 by Nobumi Iyanaga
RE: Simplified Chinese (GB2312) in Manila
2/23/2002 by Samuel Reynolds
>Read on the web at http://community.scriptmeridian.org/16162 >---------------------------------- > >On 2/22/2002
2/23/2002 by Samuel Reynolds