RE: To the heart of the matter
Posted
Last Modified
In Response To
2/22/2002; 1:22 PM by Emmanuel. M. DecarieLast Modified
In Response To
2/22/2002; 1:22 PM by Emmanuel. M. Decarie
Re: To the heart of the matter (#16147)
Reply To This Message [Edit]
À (At) 13:14 -0500 22/02/02, Bill Kearney écrivait (wrote) :
>Uh, here's an idea, why don't we use SourceForge? Wouldn't it be
>better to take
>advantage of existing software and network infrastructure before we run around
>reinventing the wheel?
I might be wrong, but I heard that CVS (on which I think SourceForge
is based) doesn't handle well binaries. So for Frontier/Radio roots,
we are toast.
Cheers
-Emmanuel
--
______________________________________________________________________
Emmanuel Décarie / Programmation pour le Web - Programming for the Web
Frontier - Perl - Javascript - XML <http://scriptdigital.com/>
>Uh, here's an idea, why don't we use SourceForge? Wouldn't it be
>better to take
>advantage of existing software and network infrastructure before we run around
>reinventing the wheel?
I might be wrong, but I heard that CVS (on which I think SourceForge
is based) doesn't handle well binaries. So for Frontier/Radio roots,
we are toast.
Cheers
-Emmanuel
--
______________________________________________________________________
Emmanuel Décarie / Programmation pour le Web - Programming for the Web
Frontier - Perl - Javascript - XML <http://scriptdigital.com/>
Enclosures
None.
Replies
Re: To the heart of the matter
2/22/2002 by Bill Kearney
> I might be wrong, but I heard that CVS (on which I think SourceForge > is based) doesn't handle well binaries. So for
2/22/2002 by Bill Kearney
RE: To the heart of the matter
2/22/2002 by Brent Simmons
(Disclaimer: I'm speaking for myself, not for UserLand.) I would first write a list of requirements before deciding on SourceForge
2/22/2002 by Brent Simmons