RE: SM Design Revision
Posted
Last Modified
In Response To
2/20/2002; 9:49 PM by Seth DillinghamLast Modified
In Response To
2/20/2002; 9:49 PM by Seth Dillingham
RE: SM Design Revision (#16111)
Reply To This Message [Edit]
On 2/20/02, jt said:
>Been meaning to compliment you and Seth on the SM design revision...
>(I'm not sure who all did what, but congrats to everyone involved...!)
I assume you're talking about James's test page, since nothing else has
been redesigned yet. :-)
James gets all the credit for the new design (even before it's done!). I
had nothing to do with it.
Seth
>Been meaning to compliment you and Seth on the SM design revision...
>(I'm not sure who all did what, but congrats to everyone involved...!)
I assume you're talking about James's test page, since nothing else has
been redesigned yet. :-)
James gets all the credit for the new design (even before it's done!). I
had nothing to do with it.
Seth
Enclosures
None.
Replies
RE: SM Design Revision
2/20/2002 by jt
I congratulate James on the design revision, though I haven't studied it and the comments much. I contratulate you, Seth, on
2/20/2002 by jt