RE: ANN: Transport Layer Security (TLS) v0.1
Posted
Last Modified
In Response To
2/20/2002; 1:39 PM by Emmanuel. M. DecarieLast Modified
In Response To
2/20/2002; 1:39 PM by Emmanuel. M. Decarie
Re: ANN: Transport Layer Security (TLS) v0.1 (#16103)
Reply To This Message [Edit]
>So far, not a word. It's like a ghost town around here. :-)
Bang bang, you're dead! (ghost town evoke for me the Far West and
Lucky Luke) :)
Seriously, I'm very glad that such a client was developed and I
might be able to test once my client renew its SSL certificates.
In theory, a client could get an xml-rpc stream on SSL, but I have
yet to test that.
Cheers
-Emmanuel
--
______________________________________________________________________
Emmanuel Décarie / Programmation pour le Web - Programming for the Web
Frontier - Perl - Javascript - XML <http://scriptdigital.com/>
Bang bang, you're dead! (ghost town evoke for me the Far West and
Lucky Luke) :)
Seriously, I'm very glad that such a client was developed and I
might be able to test once my client renew its SSL certificates.
In theory, a client could get an xml-rpc stream on SSL, but I have
yet to test that.
Cheers
-Emmanuel
--
______________________________________________________________________
Emmanuel Décarie / Programmation pour le Web - Programming for the Web
Frontier - Perl - Javascript - XML <http://scriptdigital.com/>
Enclosures
None.
Replies
Re: ANN: Transport Layer Security (TLS) v0.1
2/20/2002 by James Spahr
> In theory, a client could get an xml-rpc stream on SSL, but I have > yet to test that. All backend operations (tracking,
2/20/2002 by James Spahr