RE: Bugz again
Posted
Last Modified
In Response To
2/18/2002; 5:14 PM by Emmanuel. M. DecarieLast Modified
In Response To
2/18/2002; 5:14 PM by Emmanuel. M. Decarie
Re: Bugz again (#16087)
Reply To This Message [Edit]
>Read on the web at http://community.scriptmeridian.org/16087
>----------------------------------
>
>OK, I added a field called Additional Details, which is available to
>the bug reporter at reporting time and in edit this page mode.
I think that there is bug in the Bugs db :). When I posted my bug (on
blank template in Radio, that is more I guess a feature not really
implemented than a bug), I had a work-around, so I filled this field.
But I totally forgot to escape the "<" like in <%bodytext%>. So I had
to reedit this field. But it seems that once a bug is posted, there
is no way for the author of the bug to edit the "Additional Details"
field, you have to create a new one.
For the field "Software affected", IMO its better to have 3 fields,
one list field for UserLand product (Frontier, Manila, Radio), one
field for third parties, and one field called "other" where you can
enter some text (in case that the third parties fields doesn't have
the plug-in, tools, suite... listed).
I think the schema is good.
What could be nice is to be able to vote on a bug (something like: "I
can reproduce this bug: [yes] [no]).
Cheers
-Emmanuel
--
______________________________________________________________________
Emmanuel Décarie / Programmation pour le Web - Programming for the Web
Frontier - Perl - Javascript - XML <http://scriptdigital.com/>
>----------------------------------
>
>OK, I added a field called Additional Details, which is available to
>the bug reporter at reporting time and in edit this page mode.
I think that there is bug in the Bugs db :). When I posted my bug (on
blank template in Radio, that is more I guess a feature not really
implemented than a bug), I had a work-around, so I filled this field.
But I totally forgot to escape the "<" like in <%bodytext%>. So I had
to reedit this field. But it seems that once a bug is posted, there
is no way for the author of the bug to edit the "Additional Details"
field, you have to create a new one.
For the field "Software affected", IMO its better to have 3 fields,
one list field for UserLand product (Frontier, Manila, Radio), one
field for third parties, and one field called "other" where you can
enter some text (in case that the third parties fields doesn't have
the plug-in, tools, suite... listed).
I think the schema is good.
What could be nice is to be able to vote on a bug (something like: "I
can reproduce this bug: [yes] [no]).
Cheers
-Emmanuel
--
______________________________________________________________________
Emmanuel Décarie / Programmation pour le Web - Programming for the Web
Frontier - Perl - Javascript - XML <http://scriptdigital.com/>
Enclosures
None.
Replies
RE: Bugz again
2/19/2002 by David A. Bayly
> >I think that there is bug in the Bugs db :). When I posted my bug (on >blank template in Radio, that is more I guess
2/19/2002 by David A. Bayly