At 03:50 16.02.2002 -0500, James Spahr wrote:
>The design facelift on SM continues, as some people know. I need some
>feedback, particularly of a technical nature.


- looks good in Opera 6 WinNt!
(degrades so fluidly, man)

- aesthetic: imho there are too many different fonts
-- just have different sizes of a single one


- msg # / consistency:
in the single message view, e.g. http://community.scriptmeridian.org/16074
"In Response To" refers to msg #, but own msg# seems
evident only in the url



>Obviously we can (and will) do a non-css display if a CSS only display is
>used. I need to know how many community members this adversely affects in
>order to decide which type of display will be the default / how to proceed
>for here.


my 2 cents (Euro, n.b.):
CSS is W3C, and any browser that isn't is Not Good.
I heartily recommend opera.

Only concern: accessibility. but a quick google
shows that http://www.afb.org/ uses CSS, so it
must be ok.

[more digging shows there's guidelines at http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG10/
[..]
3.3 Use style sheets to control layout and presentation.
[..]
]


ok, we no return you to your regular geekstuff!

e

--
http://mp3.com/groins

Enclosures

None.  

Replies