Suggestion
Posted
Last Modified
In Response To
2/6/2002; 6:43 AM by Daniel BerlingerLast Modified
In Response To
2/6/2002; 6:43 AM by Daniel Berlinger
Re: Supporting Winerlog (#15663)
Reply To This Message [Edit]
>Someone remarked that Seth was the only developer that seemed to have
>found a way to co-exist with Winer.
Let's assume this is true (it isn't, but I don't want to get side-tracked).
And if folks want to build off of "Manila" but can't because of "bugs" that UserLand won't fix (don't know, and still)
Why don't all of you build off of Conversant instead? It's upside for everyone.
Seth's gets to sell more copies of his product. You get to work with Seth.
Seth insulates you from dealing directly with UserLand since that seems to be a sticking point.
Developers should be able to get what they want, and everything should move forward after a long break.
Where's the downside? Everyone wins.
Thoughts?
d.
PS Seth may have his own opinion about this, I didn't ask him :)
>found a way to co-exist with Winer.
Let's assume this is true (it isn't, but I don't want to get side-tracked).
And if folks want to build off of "Manila" but can't because of "bugs" that UserLand won't fix (don't know, and still)
Why don't all of you build off of Conversant instead? It's upside for everyone.
Seth's gets to sell more copies of his product. You get to work with Seth.
Seth insulates you from dealing directly with UserLand since that seems to be a sticking point.
Developers should be able to get what they want, and everything should move forward after a long break.
Where's the downside? Everyone wins.
Thoughts?
d.
PS Seth may have his own opinion about this, I didn't ask him :)
Enclosures
None.
Replies
Re: Suggestion
2/6/2002 by Duncan Smeed
<x-flowed>>[snip] >Why don't all of you build off of Conversant instead? It's upside >for everyone. This is a great suggestion.
2/6/2002 by Duncan Smeed
RE: Suggestion
2/6/2002 by jt
<x-charset iso-8859-1>I'm not familiar enough with the technologies involved to judge on those merits. Having said that, I
2/6/2002 by jt
Re: Suggestion (Conversant)
2/6/2002 by Seth Dillingham
This is long. I'm sorry. It touches on a lot of what's been discussed here today, and what might happen with Conversant, and
2/6/2002 by Seth Dillingham